tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996559676441105299.post4332198654783389958..comments2023-05-02T19:43:32.436+10:00Comments on Kelosophy: On The Other FootUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996559676441105299.post-45666202976588501172009-02-12T13:43:00.000+11:002009-02-12T13:43:00.000+11:00Well, I didn't know anyone thought Hitler was an a...Well, I didn't know anyone thought Hitler was an atheist.<BR/><BR/>You pretty much put the argument the only way it should be used.<BR/><BR/>I think that from either side it is a weak opening. As an opening it serves no purpose. <BR/>Wow, you write all the time!Dannyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06067869732772723839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996559676441105299.post-748341665102394882009-02-10T16:06:00.000+11:002009-02-10T16:06:00.000+11:00On the Stalin / atheism link, what Stalin did had ...On the Stalin / atheism link, what Stalin did had nothing to do with atheism, nor was it in the name of atheism. That's one thing that never seems to get through to theists. Stalin was a tyrant who killed in order to keep his own power, whereas there are legitimately people who have killed in the name of God and for the sole purpose of God. <BR/><BR/>I guess where Stalin would come in is if one Khttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12460075520187803334noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996559676441105299.post-19444505937070225772009-02-10T06:08:00.000+11:002009-02-10T06:08:00.000+11:00The whole Stalin/atheist thing would have been ok ...The whole Stalin/atheist thing would have been ok if used in the right place, like when someone talks about all the bad things that have happened in the name of God. In this sense, Stalin would not be the only example, by any means. But it has nothing to do with whether there is or is not a God. It also has nothing to do with an atheist who comes from Australias morals. The argument about Dannyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06067869732772723839noreply@blogger.com