tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996559676441105299.post7297767974908607738..comments2023-05-02T19:43:32.436+10:00Comments on Kelosophy: Irrelevant ArgumentsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996559676441105299.post-86464599573863319442011-07-28T16:29:36.858+10:002011-07-28T16:29:36.858+10:00I mentain you in my blog, i guess you wouldn't...I mentain you in my blog, i guess you wouldn't mind. http://outthinks.blogspot.com/2011/07/potential_6129.htmloutTakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16869430398064396981noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996559676441105299.post-38758228672042583962011-07-25T01:44:16.084+10:002011-07-25T01:44:16.084+10:00It's primarily a comfort issue. The message th...It's primarily a comfort issue. The message that your particular god created all things is comforting to religious people.<br /><br />Religions need origin-based arguments for God because they have origin stories. Christians often argue God's commandments must be followed because God created all things. Notice how frequently God is referred to as "The Creator".<br /><br />The llewellyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16001213921499191213noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996559676441105299.post-29957854040139233462011-07-25T00:44:02.282+10:002011-07-25T00:44:02.282+10:00Does not the existence of a force with intent unbo...Does not the existence of a force with intent unbound by our universe's laws provide a level of framework on which to hang a personal interventionist deity? If the cosmological argument actually worked, was rigourous in a fashion that brooked no dispute, it wouldn't prove that an interventionist diety exists, but it would provide for something which has a similar scope thus making the Dhorvathnoreply@blogger.com